Pharmaceuticals

Vascepa’s ACS Advantage

Amarin’s fish oil-based Vascepa (icosapent ethyl, aka IPE) made its mark in 2018’s REDUCE-IT trial after achieving a 25% MACE reduction among high-risk statin users, and new post hoc analysis of the same data suggests that IPE might have an even greater benefit among patients who recently had acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

Researchers analyzed 840 REDUCE-IT participants (10.3% of total trial) who experienced ACS within 12 months of trial randomization, finding that most patients who received IPE treatments had better five-year outcomes than those who received a placebo, including:

  • 36% reduced incidence of the composite primary endpoint (CV death, non-fatal MI, non-fatal stroke, coronary revascularization, or hospitalization for unstable angina)
  • 44% fewer urgent or emergent revascularizations
  • 36% reduced incidence of the composite secondary outcomes (CV death, non-fatal MI, or non-fatal stroke)

Patients in the IPE group also enjoyed a 9.3% absolute risk reduction for experiencing a first composite primary event (18.7% vs. 28%) and had a “number needed to treat” to avoid a primary event of 11 patients. 

  • That appears to suggest that IPE treatment timing is crucial with ACS. IPE had a far lower absolute risk reduction and much higher number needed to treat (4.7% & 21) among 3,651 patients in the original REDUCE-IT trial who experienced ACS 12 months or more before randomization.

IPE treatments also showed a positive safety profile with recent ACS patients, matching the placebo group for patients with at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (78.8% vs. 76.7%), total bleeding (6.9% vs. 8.1%), and bleeding-related serious adverse events (1.6% vs. 3.2%), even among patients who received DAPT.

  • IPE’s bleeding risk advantages are notable given that ACS patients generally receive intensive antithrombotic therapy. However, like the original REDUCE-IT trial, IPE had higher treatment-related rates of AFib or flutter (7.4% vs. 2.9%).

The Takeaway

With two FDA clearances and 20 million prescriptions so far, IPE has achieved quite a bit, but it hasn’t yet reached what some viewed as its early potential — and even the REDUCE-IT trial has faced its share of criticism. This study might not drastically alleviate IPE’s headwinds, but it does provide solid evidence supporting initiating IPE “as soon as possible after ACS.”

Get twice-weekly insights on the biggest stories shaping cardiology.

You might also like

Surgeries & Interventions December 11, 2025

CAD and Treating it With PCI has No Impact on TAVR December 11, 2025

New post-hoc results from SCOPE I suggest that patients who have obstructive coronary artery disease as well as symptomatic severe aortic stenosis have similar outcomes to patients without CAD three years after TAVR. The study also suggests performing PCI in parallel to TAVR provides no benefit to these patients. But does the presence of CAD […]

Cardiac Imaging December 15, 2025

CathWorks FFRangio Goes Beyond Physiology December 15, 2025

Despite society guidelines and extensive clinical evidence demonstrating that traditional wire-based coronary physiology improves outcomes and reduces costs compared to angiography alone1-2, physiology continues to be disappointingly underutilized globally due to the inconvenience and time it adds to the procedure. The novel CathWorks FFRangio System combines artificial intelligence and advanced computational science to obtain physiologic […]

Obesity Care December 8, 2025

Childhood Obesity CHD Risks Might Be Reversible December 8, 2025

Childhood obesity’s cardiovascular consequences might be reversible with timely intervention, after a Swedish study demonstrated that children who were overweight but achieved normal weight by young adulthood had similar coronary heart disease risk to their “never-overweight” peers. The BMI Epidemiology Study analysis linked health records to nationwide registries for 103k people in Sweden to track […]