Cardiology Pharmaceuticals

The Potential of Personalized Hypertension Medicine

A new study out of Sweden shows that people with hypertension can respond significantly better to some treatments than others, suggesting that hypertension medicine decisions might become far more personalized in the future.

It’s traditionally been challenging to get hypertension under control, in part because a single antihypertensive drug often doesn’t achieve sufficient BP reduction and many patients don’t want to add a second medication. 

  • However, this new study suggests that hypertension control might be far less of a challenge if each patient was prescribed the optimal medication for them the first time around.

In the randomized, double-blind, repeated crossover trial, 280 Swedish people with grade 1 hypertension and low CV event risks were treated with four different blood pressure medications in random order (lisinopril, candesartan, hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine). 

Data from 1,468 two-month treatment periods and 270 patients showed “substantial” variations in treatment responses between individuals (P < .001), finding that each participant’s optimal antihypertensive drug could reduce their systolic blood pressure by an additional 4.4 mm Hg compared to the study’s other treatment options. 

Each individual’s optimal antihypertensive drug also improved systolic blood pressure by…

  • 3.1 mm Hg compared the group’s most effective overall treatment (lisinopril)
  • 2-times compared to doubling the dosage of another antihypertensive option
  • Over 50% compared to combining two different antihypertensive options

This new evidence that antihypertensive drugs have different effects on different patients could set the stage for larger RCTs to see if these findings can be replicated and to identify what factors influence treatment response variations. If successful, those trials might lead to big changes in hypertension treatment decisions.

The Takeaway

Although it might not be surprising that different patients respond better or worse to different medications, this study reframes what some might have historically described as standard deviation into an opportunity to start making hypertension treatment far more precise.

Get twice-weekly insights on the biggest stories shaping cardiology.

You might also like

Cardiac Imaging June 16, 2025

Beyond Hardware: Is AI the Answer to Making Cardiac Imaging more Accessible? June 16, 2025

Sponsored by Philips Healthcare Cardiac imaging has traditionally improved through hardware advances, enabling the speed needed for high-quality images. However, hardware is rapidly reaching its physical limitations in suppressing cardiac motion and represents a large financial investment. Today, software and AI are driving the next leap in cardiac image quality and motion control – offering […]

Cardiology Pharmaceuticals June 12, 2025

FDA Approves a New BP Triple Polypill June 12, 2025

Bringing a more effective BP therapy to the U.S. market, the FDA approved George Medicines’ triple therapy polypill called Widaplik for patients with hypertension, making it the first of its kind to go to market in the U.S. Widaplik’s approval stems from two studies, including one comparing the polypill against placebo as an initial treatment […]

Cardiology Pharmaceuticals June 12, 2025

Pharmacologic Preconditioning to Improve Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery  June 12, 2025

The majority of patients undergoing cardiac surgery, especially those on cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), experience post-operative complications such as new-onset atrial fibrillation (POAF) and acute kidney injury (AKI), largely driven by oxidative stress and inflammation.   Several approaches have been explored to reduce complications following cardiac surgery, however, a clinically meaningful impact has yet to be realized.  […]

You might also like..

Select All

You're signed up!

It's great to have you as a reader. Check your inbox for a welcome email.

-- The Cardiac Wire Team

You're all set!