Surgeries & Interventions

TCT 2024’s Top TAVR Studies

This year’s TCT conference saw a deluge of TAVR studies examining everything from the efficacy of valve designs to TAVR’s impact on aortic and tricuspid regurgitation.

Out of all these TAVR studies, the four that could have the greatest clinical impact focused on interventional timing and the risk of comorbidities and procedural complications.

The EARLY TAVR trial shined the brightest spotlight on TAVR timing, finding that earlier intervention in patients with asymptomatic severe AS may be more beneficial than watchful waiting.

  • Patients who received early TAVR were 16% less likely to experience MACE and saw better heart function over a median of 3.8 years, which may be enough to challenge current guidelines that call for routine surveillance every 6 to 12 months.

Conversely, the similarly structured EVOLVED trial found that early TAVR failed to lower mortality risks in asymptomatic AS patients who had evidence of myocardial fibrosis (14% vs. 13% for conservative care).

  • However, early TAVR could increase these patients’ healthspan thanks to better symptom control and fewer hospitalizations (6% vs. 17%). 

The TAVR UNLOAD trial also found that there’s not much to gain by performing earlier TAVR in patients with HFrEF and moderate aortic stenosis.

  • Earlier TAVR didn’t result in statistically better outcomes than clinical surveillance, but it did support a greater improvement in overall KCCQ scores (12.8 vs 3.2).

The PROTECTED TAVR trial rounded out the major TAVR late-breakers, finding that cerebral embolic protection’s benefits varied geographically, and somehow didn’t reduce overall strokes.

  • The study revealed significant stroke risk reductions with U.S.-performed TAVRs (-50% overall, -73% disabling), but no stroke benefits when performed outside the U.S.

The Takeaway

In addition to highlighting the massive role that TAVR plays in interventional cardiology workloads, the major TCT2024 TAVR trials’ mixed results related to procedure timing and patient complications underscored just how important an individualized approach is for TAVR.

Get twice-weekly insights on the biggest stories shaping cardiology.

You might also like

Surgeries & Interventions December 11, 2025

CAD and Treating it With PCI has No Impact on TAVR December 11, 2025

New post-hoc results from SCOPE I suggest that patients who have obstructive coronary artery disease as well as symptomatic severe aortic stenosis have similar outcomes to patients without CAD three years after TAVR. The study also suggests performing PCI in parallel to TAVR provides no benefit to these patients. But does the presence of CAD […]

Cardiac Imaging May 4, 2000

CathWorks FFRangio Goes Beyond Physiology May 4, 2000

Despite society guidelines and extensive clinical evidence demonstrating that traditional wire-based coronary physiology improves outcomes and reduces costs compared to angiography alone1-2, physiology continues to be disappointingly underutilized globally due to the inconvenience and time it adds to the procedure. The novel CathWorks FFRangio System combines artificial intelligence and advanced computational science to obtain physiologic […]

Obesity Care December 8, 2025

Childhood Obesity CHD Risks Might Be Reversible December 8, 2025

Childhood obesity’s cardiovascular consequences might be reversible with timely intervention, after a Swedish study demonstrated that children who were overweight but achieved normal weight by young adulthood had similar coronary heart disease risk to their “never-overweight” peers. The BMI Epidemiology Study analysis linked health records to nationwide registries for 103k people in Sweden to track […]