Population Health

Nearly Half of American Counties Don’t Have Cardiologists

If it seems like your patients are coming from a lot further away these days, that might because nearly half of U.S. counties don’t have a single cardiologist working there.

Researchers from Brigham and Women’s Hospital teamed up with GoodRx to analyze data from all 3,143 counties in the US, finding that 46.3% of U.S. counties don’t have a single cardiologist, and this regional cardiologist imbalance often results in…

  • Much Longer Patient Drives – The 22M people who live in these “cardiology desert” counties have to drive an average of 87.1 miles round trip to see their cardiologist, versus just 16.3 miles for patients who live in counties with cardiologists. 
  • Exacerbated Inequalities Unsurprisingly, 86.2% of those cardiologist-less counties are rural, where patients tend to be poorer and sicker. In fact, patients in no-cardiologist counties had 31% higher CV risk index scores (2.8 vs. 2.1) and worse access to healthy foods (7.2 vs. 7.6 scores).
  • Urban Physician Density – Counties with cardiologists have an average of 24 local cardiologists, although 10% of those counties had just one cardiologist (who is likely overworked).
  • PCP Pressure – The rural cardiologist shortage also places more responsibility on primary care physicians, although cardiologist-less counties also have far fewer PCPs than counties with cardiologists (40.8 vs. 63.2 per 100k residents).

The authors believe that cardiology care’s rural/urban divide is growing wider, and clearly show that it’s having a major impact on outcomes, since cardiologist-less counties had higher age-adjusted cardiovascular mortality rates versus counties with cardiologists (281 vs. 269 per 100k adults) and one year shorter life expectancy.

The solution? The authors highlight digital health’s potential to bridge geographic gaps to cardiovascular care, but also endorse incentivizing more clinicians to practice in rural areas, and better integrating cardiovascular care with primary care (especially regarding CVD prevention and risk modification).

The Takeaway
This is far from the first time that we’ve covered rural America’s problems with cardiovascular care and access, and identifying a problem is a key step towards solving it. However, this latest data suggests that big changes will have to happen before we see meaningful improvements to rural cardiovascular care.

Get twice-weekly insights on the biggest stories shaping cardiology.

You might also like

Heart Failure October 20, 2025

Don’t Blame Your Heart for Heart Failure October 20, 2025

Perhaps the biggest cardiology story of the year, an entire issue of JACC now hypothesizes that heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) might actually be caused by visceral fat tissue that triggers cardiac weakening through adipokine signaling. The new unifying adiposity framework now proposes that visceral fat expansion causes secretion of an altered adipokine […]

Cardiology Business October 16, 2025

MedAxiom Report: Cardiologist Compensation Soars, Patient Access Struggles October 16, 2025

Good news and bad news from MedAxiom’s latest cardiology compensation survey. The good news? Cardiologist median compensation reached new record highs last year. The bad news? Patient access deteriorated while the number of patients physicians had to manage swelled. The 2025 survey findings aggregated data across cardiology, cardiac surgery, and vascular surgery specialties, examining compensation […]

Heart Failure October 13, 2025

Specialist Care Can Improve HF Outcomes Across the Board October 13, 2025

A recent study out of the U.K. suggests that multidisciplinary team management could significantly reduce death or rehospitalization risk for HF patients across the LVEF spectrum. Based in a single U.K. county, the Buckinghamshire analysis examined 2.1k patients hospitalized for acute heart failure who received either specialist care or standard care over a 618-day follow-up […]