Cardiogenetics

For Genetic Tests, Size Matters 

next gen sequencing

A study in JAMA Cardiology found that broader genetic tests are better at identifying patients with cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias than disease-specific tests, despite perceived drawbacks. 

Currently, physicians typically use tests that are designed to find a specific type of cardiomyopathy or a specific type of arrhythmia. This is because examining a larger slice of a person’s genome will inherently capture a greater number of genetic mutations, and sometimes clinicians do not know what the impact of a genetic change will be on the patient’s risk. 

This uncertainty can create confusion for both the clinician and the patient. The authors of an editorial on the study explain that these “gray zone” variants are often seen as the price you pay for broader tests. 

But this retrospective study challenges that outlook. Physicians ordered combined cardiomyopathy and arrhythmia genetic testing for 4,789 patients and found that the combined testing identified clinically relevant variants for 1 in 5 patients:

  • 954 of 4,789 (20%) were flagged as a “positive” result.
  • 66% of these positives (630 patients) provided meaningful information that could inform clinical decision-making.
  • If testing had been restricted to panels associated with the clinician-provided diagnostic indications, 75 of 689 positive results (11%) would have been missed.

The Takeaway

In contrast to typical practice, it appears that more comprehensive genetic panels produce meaningful insights that could guide physician decision-making. When it comes to testing for cardiomyopathies and arrhythmias, the added burden of uncertainty may be worth it.

Get twice-weekly insights on the biggest stories shaping cardiology.

You might also like

Heart Failure October 20, 2025

Don’t Blame Your Heart for Heart Failure October 20, 2025

Perhaps the biggest cardiology story of the year, an entire issue of JACC now hypothesizes that heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) might actually be caused by visceral fat tissue that triggers cardiac weakening through adipokine signaling. The new unifying adiposity framework now proposes that visceral fat expansion causes secretion of an altered adipokine […]

Cardiology Business October 16, 2025

MedAxiom Report: Cardiologist Compensation Soars, Patient Access Struggles October 16, 2025

Good news and bad news from MedAxiom’s latest cardiology compensation survey. The good news? Cardiologist median compensation reached new record highs last year. The bad news? Patient access deteriorated while the number of patients physicians had to manage swelled. The 2025 survey findings aggregated data across cardiology, cardiac surgery, and vascular surgery specialties, examining compensation […]

Heart Failure October 13, 2025

Specialist Care Can Improve HF Outcomes Across the Board October 13, 2025

A recent study out of the U.K. suggests that multidisciplinary team management could significantly reduce death or rehospitalization risk for HF patients across the LVEF spectrum. Based in a single U.K. county, the Buckinghamshire analysis examined 2.1k patients hospitalized for acute heart failure who received either specialist care or standard care over a 618-day follow-up […]