Cardiology Pharmaceuticals

The Potential of Personalized Hypertension Medicine

A new study out of Sweden shows that people with hypertension can respond significantly better to some treatments than others, suggesting that hypertension medicine decisions might become far more personalized in the future.

It’s traditionally been challenging to get hypertension under control, in part because a single antihypertensive drug often doesn’t achieve sufficient BP reduction and many patients don’t want to add a second medication. 

  • However, this new study suggests that hypertension control might be far less of a challenge if each patient was prescribed the optimal medication for them the first time around.

In the randomized, double-blind, repeated crossover trial, 280 Swedish people with grade 1 hypertension and low CV event risks were treated with four different blood pressure medications in random order (lisinopril, candesartan, hydrochlorothiazide, amlodipine). 

Data from 1,468 two-month treatment periods and 270 patients showed “substantial” variations in treatment responses between individuals (P < .001), finding that each participant’s optimal antihypertensive drug could reduce their systolic blood pressure by an additional 4.4 mm Hg compared to the study’s other treatment options. 

Each individual’s optimal antihypertensive drug also improved systolic blood pressure by…

  • 3.1 mm Hg compared the group’s most effective overall treatment (lisinopril)
  • 2-times compared to doubling the dosage of another antihypertensive option
  • Over 50% compared to combining two different antihypertensive options

This new evidence that antihypertensive drugs have different effects on different patients could set the stage for larger RCTs to see if these findings can be replicated and to identify what factors influence treatment response variations. If successful, those trials might lead to big changes in hypertension treatment decisions.

The Takeaway

Although it might not be surprising that different patients respond better or worse to different medications, this study reframes what some might have historically described as standard deviation into an opportunity to start making hypertension treatment far more precise.

Get twice-weekly insights on the biggest stories shaping cardiology.

You might also like

Electrophysiology August 21, 2025

Conduction-System Pacing Succeeds at Treating AV Block August 21, 2025

Conduction-system pacing could be poised to reshape standard care for atrioventricular (AV) block patients after the randomized CSPACE trial demonstrated its significant benefits over traditional right ventricular septal pacing. Taking a closer look at CSP’s potential, the CSPACE trial enrolled 202 patients with AV block at two Australian hospitals, randomizing them to conduction-system pacing or […]

Cardiology Pharmaceuticals August 18, 2025

Rivaroxaban Monotherapy Could Be Better for CAD + AFib August 18, 2025

New analysis from the AFIRE trial suggests rivaroxaban monotherapy might be emerging as a preferred antithrombotic strategy for patients with AFib and stable coronary artery disease, especially in older age groups. The Post Hoc AFIRE Analysis examined 2,215 Japanese patients with AFib and stable CAD, stratifying them into four age groups (<70, 70-74, 75-79, and […]

Surgeries & Interventions August 14, 2025

TEER Could Save Lives in AFMR Patients August 14, 2025

Shedding light on a new treatment for an understudied condition, data published in EHJ suggests that transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) delivers significant survival advantages in patients with atrial functional mitral regurgitation (FMR). The new OCEAN-Mitral/REVEAL-AFMR Analysis compared 441 TEER-treated patients against 640 medically managed controls with moderate or severe atrial FMR, stating a solid case […]

You might also like..

Select All

You're signed up!

It's great to have you as a reader. Check your inbox for a welcome email.

-- The Cardiac Wire Team

You're all set!